GULFHE Fellowship Framework

GULFHE Professional Excellence and Impact Framework

All assessed GULFHE recognition is governed by the GULFHE Professional Excellence and Impact Framework (GPEIF). The framework combines a recognition level with a professional pathway and assesses evidence through four common dimensions, five professional commitments and the SCALE evidence test.

GPEIF

One framework for professional excellence and measurable impact

4 Assessment Dimensions
5 Professional Commitments
SCALE Evidence Test
11 Professional Pathways
One Common Framework

One framework, multiple professional contexts

The GPEIF allows people working in different parts of the higher-education ecosystem to demonstrate excellence without forcing every applicant to present the same type of evidence.

Professional context may differ, but the expectation for credible, attributable and ethical impact remains common across every pathway.

01

Academic Practice

Teaching, learning, research and scholarly contribution.

02

Professional Practice

Student services, quality, development and institutional support.

03

Leadership & Strategy

Institutional, cross-institutional and sector-level influence.

04

Industry & Policy

Industry partnership, employability, policy and wider sector impact.

Assessment Framework

Four Assessment Dimensions

Every assessed Fellowship application is considered through four common dimensions that examine professional responsibility, measurable impact, leadership and wider contribution.

A1

Professional Practice and Authority

What do you do, decide, design, lead, deliver or steward, and with what professional judgement and accountability?

Scope • Responsibility • Judgement
A2

Impact, Transformation and Outcomes

What changed because of your contribution, for whom, to what extent and with what assurance?

Outcomes • Change • Evidence
A3

Leadership, Influence and Stewardship

How do you enable others, build capability, share ownership and sustain responsible influence?

Leadership • Influence • Sustainability
A4

Scholarly, Digital and Societal Contribution

How do you use, create or mobilise evidence, knowledge, policy and responsible innovation for wider benefit?

Knowledge • Innovation • Wider Benefit
Professional Commitments

Five commitments that underpin professional recognition

These commitments apply across recognition levels and professional pathways and help demonstrate responsible, sustainable and reflective professional practice.

01

Ethical and Accountable Practice

Act responsibly, transparently and with appropriate professional accountability.

02

Inclusion, Context and Cultural Intelligence

Recognise context, diversity and the needs of different communities and stakeholders.

03

Evidence, Scholarship and Responsible Innovation

Use evidence, knowledge and innovation responsibly to strengthen professional practice.

04

Collaboration, Reciprocity and Stewardship

Build capability, share responsibility and contribute constructively with others.

05

Reflection, Learning and Continuous Enhancement

Reflect critically, learn from experience and continue to improve professional practice.

Evidence Quality

The SCALE evidence test

SCALE helps applicants present evidence that clearly demonstrates personal contribution, context, verification, professional learning and meaningful effect.

S

Specific Contribution

State what you personally decided, designed, led, delivered, enabled or changed.

C

Context

Explain the problem, baseline, stakeholders, constraints and environment in which the work took place.

A

Assurance

Show how the claim can be verified through data, documentation, stakeholder confirmation or other credible evidence.

L

Learning

Explain what you learned, what did not work as expected and how your professional judgement developed.

E

Effect

Explain what changed, who benefited, the scale of the effect and whether the change was sustained.

Evidence Guidance

What counts as evidence?

Evidence should directly support the claims made in your application. Applicants should use the smallest sufficient set of relevant evidence rather than uploading large volumes of loosely connected material.

Verified outcomes and evaluation data
Formal reports and approved policies
Curriculum or programme materials
Research and knowledge-exchange outputs
Stakeholder feedback and testimonials
Adoption and implementation records
Quality or accreditation evidence
Project documentation
Evidence must be appropriate and responsible.

Evidence should be authentic, relevant, proportionate, current enough for the claim, ethically obtained and shared with appropriate permission. Confidential or personal data should be minimised and anonymised wherever possible.

Assessment

What reviewers are looking for

Reviewers assess the application against the published level descriptors. Strong applications demonstrate a clear relationship between personal contribution, credible evidence, professional reflection and the claimed level of impact.

A long application does not compensate for weak evidence or unclear personal contribution.
Relevance
Authenticity
Sufficiency
Attribution
Assurance
Ethical Practice
Critical Reflection
Sustainability
Reach of Impact
Before You Apply

Use the framework before you prepare your application

Review the controlled Fellowship documents that apply to your chosen recognition level and professional pathway before preparing or submitting an application.

01

Master Framework

Review the GULFHE Professional Excellence and Impact Framework that governs assessed recognition.

View Framework →
02

Professional Pathways Handbook

Understand the eleven pathways and select the most relevant professional context for your evidence.

View Pathway Resources →
Controlled documents are authoritative. Where a promotional web summary differs from the current controlled framework or policy, the controlled document applies.
Prepare With Confidence

Ready to use the framework for your Fellowship application?

Compare the recognition levels, download the relevant framework and review the application process before preparing your submission.